We connect what your people learn to what actually happens in the business afterward — not just whether they finished a course, but whether it changed something that mattered — and we're honest about how confident that link really is.
Not for lack of trying — everyone runs a survey after every session. But post-training satisfaction and real on-the-job behaviour change barely correlate at all, so the one number most companies collect is close to meaningless as evidence.
SmartShrubs ties every program to one real business result before it launches — never a KPI picked after the fact because it happened to look good. The resulting score is computed honestly depending on what data exists: hard evidence where possible, a transparent estimate where it isn't, and a plain "not linked yet" where no target was agreed.
Not a completion rate. A business result, honestly scored.
No baseline recorded before a program starts means no impact score for it, full stop — the single most common reason training-impact measurement fails industry-wide.
If a result improved after a program, we'll show you the two are connected — not that the training definitely caused it. That distinction is easy to blur and it's exactly where L&D usually loses credibility with the business.
Proof where the data exists. A clear estimate where it doesn't. And a plain "not enough evidence yet" where neither applies — a guess never gets to look like proof.
Full DPDP-compliant handling of learning and assessment records — purpose limitation, consent tracking, audit logging on every access.
A live sample of the enterprise dashboard — every Business Impact figure carries its attribution tier, and the wording never claims more than the evidence supports.
of organisations currently measure the actual business impact of their learning programs.
— McKinsey, 2026the correlation between post-training satisfaction scores and real on-the-job behaviour change — despite being the most common way training gets evaluated.
— Formbricks, 2026of L&D professionals rely on performance reviews as their nearest proxy for business impact — not an agreed KPI.
— Research.com, 2026higher profit margin at organisations with comprehensive, effective training programs, compared to those without.
— ATD / Deloitte, 2026Report completion rates and post-session satisfaction scores
Ties every program to a real business result, before it even launches
Present an "impact score" with no visible baseline or attribution method
Every figure carries its baseline, its tier, and exactly how confident to be
Let an impact claim quietly imply causation
Shows what's connected, not what's certain — never overclaims what training did
Drop tracking for a program once no business KPI was agreed
Shows it honestly as "not yet linked" — never a blank, never a guess
Connect with us to see what Learning Intelligence could look like for your organisation.